Posted by ShaunS on Dec 20, 2015; 5:08pm
URL: https://coalpha.arkian.net/ANNO-DOMINI-A-new-religion-tp7576696p7576702.html

The Antichrist
^^^^^^^^^
The nature of the Antichrist has not been understood or conveyed correctly within the religion. This character is a religious icon and is often present in many eras. There appears to be a pre-Christian origin in the form of the Fool - King for A Day, that appears in May Day celebrations, although not much seems to be known about the character. The three aspects of this religion consist of God Almighty and the projection by extension of the Good and Evil Principles into the Universe, first discerned by the Cathar Heretics. These three aspects are considered to be cyclical in nature and the two obvious forms are Evil>God>Good, and Good>God>Evil. Good and Evil are opposite to each other, while God Almighty represents a higher genius able to utilise both. The Antichrist being a religious icon is important because it can convey a choice and can only do so by genuinely presenting true Good and true Evil to choose from. It presents a Dichotomy to the human race and divides them into two camps, or at least it tries to do this. The action of the Antichrist may be viewed as attempting to impose an unnecessary duality - by choosing either Good or Evil, the individual making that choice is then rejecting God Almighty. In truth both are required at different times. The nature of God lies in alternation.


How can God Almighty be both Good and Evil at the same time:
The Cathar's failed to understand this point and as a result they discarded God Almighty. That was a blasphemy. In our religion the Good and Evil Principles are represented in the AD motif by the legs of the 'A'. Now it should be realised that the cyclic nature of these forces rather implies their alternation. In a personal setting while the Catholic Church may have Confession and Absolution (the Sacrament of Penance & Reconciliation) for Anno Domini the requirement is to be aware that your actions may be Evil or Bad, and to atone for these by doing acts of Good by way of compensation, and in this way Good and Evil tend to alternate. It does not mean that a person may do acts of Good in order to enable them… to then do acts of Evil. The premeditation involved eliminates the notion of Good in such a case. The alternation of these two principles is the key method of being both Good and Evil at the same time, and there is a very simple proof - walking.

In walking the left and right legs are moving in opposite directions. The Evil leg is carrying the weight of the individual and is moving backwards, while at exactly the same moment the Good leg which is exalted above the physical plane, is moving forwards. At a certain point the god-like brain of the human switches the roles of Good and Evil to different legs bringing the Good leg down to the physical plane where it becomes Evil, while elevating the Evil leg above the physical plane where it becomes Good and thus both now move in the opposite direction than previously. The combination of Good and Evil organised and handled by the overarching intelligence of the brain then allows the individual to deploy both Good and Evil forces at the same time to propel themselves forwards in a single direction, which is both deliberate and intentional. The interaction between the Good and Evil Principles happens in a similar way and is controlled by God Almighty to produce the direction and progress that is required in much the same sense as walking does for humans. So God Almighty is moving in a single direction of his choosing but this is not obvious because sometimes he is using Evil and sometimes he is using Good, and is generally using both at the same time.


Who is the Antichrist:
The Antichrist is a character who conveys both the Good and Evil Principles but these are not expressed at the same time. The character may initially be Good and may then become Evil, or the character may initially be Evil and may then become Good. The transformation from one principle to the other requires the power of God Almighty to be present to make the change, and the nature of that presence can vary depending on whether the transformation is from Evil to Good which would obviously be viewed positively, or from Good to Evil which would certainly be viewed negatively because of the sinister nature of the outcome. This transformation also seems to suggests a head injury of some kind which is expected to be fatal, but despite this the individual either recovers or is ressurected in a way that is not really a miracle but rather some form of fake miracle. The Antichrist is the trickster, the Fool, the King for A Day, and the last of these does give the possibility of a stand in, double, or doppelgänger type of role. There are two Antichrists that are fairly obvious, and they are both called Paul.

St. Paul was dedicated to the persecution of the early disciples of Jesus in the area of Jerusalem, but while he was on the way to Damascus Jesus Christ (resurrected) appeared to him as a great light. Now it's suggested here that he fell backwards to the ground perhaps from the horse or donkey that he was riding. He then became blind for three days but was restored by Ananias of Damascus, who was associated with the Christians that Paul was dedicated to persecuting previously. Paul changed his ways and began preaching that Jesus of Nazareth was the Messiah and the Son of God. Now Paul was a very duplicitious character who was also know as Saul. He was Hebrew but also Roman, and Greek was his first language. He was either single or married or was married and became single?

St. Paul was an Antichrist following the sequence Evil>God>Good. He was originally Evil but became Good. The transformation included a flash of light and potentially a head injury or brain trauma. After three days he recovered and became the Good version of his previous self. 13 books of the New Testament are attributed to Paul and the Christian religion owes him a lot. Despite being an Antichrist the Good Principle that he conveyed after his conversion allowed him to establish the very foundations of the religion itself, and this is a very important fact. Christianity may well have faded into obscurity without Paul - and yet he was the Antichrist on account of his double nature.

This example is not recognised by the present religion, but it is correct and it shows that the Antichrist is rather like a Messiah (a faulty Messiah), one that fails to get the required oscillation between Good and Evil. So you have a self-excited oscillator that doesn't fire up, and instead gets stuck in one state or the other, but at some point it flips into the opposing state. The example below is also not recognised by the present religion and this is because the change of direction to Phase 3 has produced many changes that the current population are not aware of. This ignorance is hazardous and the people are unhappy to change and embrace new concepts.

Sir Paul was one of the Beatles and was generally the brains of the rock band. Now Paul was a very duplicitious character who was also know as James, and later in life has been known as Billy Shears aka William Shepherd or possibly William Campbell? He was born in Liverpool or Scotland in his later life? There is the general view that the original Paul McCartney died in a car accident around September or November of 1966, and was then replaced with a range of doubles. Some were able to look like the original Paul while others were able to sing like the original Paul but looked different. Eventually a double was found that looked similar who was able to impersonate the original and through the use of plastic surgery this person was made to look like the original Paul as well. This doppelgänger was then able to take his place so that the band could continue and so that the fans would not become distraught by his death. This has become known as the PID (Paul Is Dead) conspiracy and the replacement has been called 'Faul' (much like the original 'Saul' in the first example).

Sir Paul is an Antichrist following the sequence Good>God>Evil. He was originally Good but became Evil. The transformation resulted in the death of the original Paul, from a head injury. After a time he was miraculously resurrected in a fake miracle, and has since devoted his life to acting out the remaining life of the original character but in a rather sinister way. Unlike St. Paul who promoted Good and Christianity, Sir Paul has promoted Evil and Satanism and there is a proof of that. In the case of this character we must remember that the Antichrist is an important religious icon, and whether the above story is true or not, makes no difference as the duplicity between the former and the latter guy is still present and obvious. Even if the situation was the work of Satan himself, it would be God Almighty giving those instructions to Satan.

The Antichrist offers us a choice of Good or Evil to choose either runs the risk of denying God Almighty. However in the case of St. Paul, Christianity was the outcome of choosing the Good aspect, and clearly in the case of Sir Paul we too must also choose the Good aspect. But… what is it that we are choosing?

Just as St. Paul has given us Christianity, we must assume that the original Paul McCartney (the 1st i.e. James as opposed to Billy) has given us Anno Domini as a modern example of Chrstianity (in some form), but we must also assume that the 'replacement' Sir Paul has struggled to bring us Satanism. The value of the Black is that it allows us to see the White by way of the contrast between them. Another obvious point here which will be expanded upon later, is that the original concept of Prayer has now been replaced with the more active (yet apparently more passive) concept of Song. The people are not aware of this but their choice of music is having the same effect that prayers used to have long ago. When you listen to a song you are praying, and the lyrics of the song are the words of your prayer. Ignoring this change can produce very damaging results.


Maxwell's Silver Hammer (Abbey Road):
This was a song written and sung by Paul McCartney (the 2nd). The lyrics are not given here as that would be a breach of copyright.

Maxwell Edison was a student who in the first verse invites a female student, Joan out to the  pictures, but when she answers the knock at the door Maxwell uses a silver hammer to beat her on the head until she is dead. In the second verse Maxwell is back at school but the Teacher annoys him and at an opportune moment he uses the hammer to beat her on the head until she is dead too. Later after he is caught and is on trial, he creeps up behind the Judge and beats him on the head with the hammer until he is also dead.

In the first verse the female student is representative of the Brain Stem as the association is sexual. In the second verse the female Teacher is representative of the Limbic System of the brain where memories, the result of education are stored. In the final verse the Judge represents judgement which is a feature of the Cortex of the brain. The action of the hammer is such as to destroy all three parts of the brain.

The function of Evil is to kill (mostly for food). The purpose of Phase 3 is the development of the human brain. Smashing it with a hammer is the exact opposite thus Evil and anti-Christian, thus Satanic. This song is thus a Satanic Prayer, and the purpose of this prayer in a practical setting is to encourage school children to murder their teachers. This prayer has been effective and has resulted in two children stabbing their teachers with kitchen knives (although not hammers), the first of which died from the assault. The song has had an effect either on the children themselves or on their parents but is indeed the direct psychological cause of these crimes.

This is then, an example of the promotion of Satanism on the part of Sir Paul McCartney, and he is entirely responsible for producing this song and the results that it has had (and will continue) to produce. As a consequence we can see that the aims and intentions of the Satanic force at this time are dedicated to attacking the human brain and it's functioning by any means possible (and there are many).


Le Beast:
The Beast, an anagram of Beatles (albeit with a mixture of French and English). Not exactly what one might expect from the Biblical prophesies I guess, but then it's not really possible to predict the future. Religion in general also tends to suffer from a 'less than' effect. In general religions produce less results than the people hope for and this inspires their lack of belief. It's notable that Science produces exactly the kinds of results that people expect and this is one of the reasons why Science has gained more respect and more cedibility. The Beast had 7 heads with 10 horns:

Heads
1) John Lennon
2) Stuart Sutcliffe
3) Pete Best
4) Ringo Star
5) George
6) Paul 1st
7) Paul 2nd

The 'Beast' was close to getting the name right, but the correct name was Beatles and it was musical not political. Now this of course seems highly unlikely, except that we start running into coincidences. If I give the names John, Paul, and Peter - those are Apostles, not Beatles. "For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ." (2 Corinthians 11:13 - St. Paul, a previous Antichrist), and that's an obvious coincidence. If we dig deeply on the internet we can of course find gems such as: "It’s blatantly obvious that nearly every English-singing pop band of the past forty years bears the mark of the Beatles." from Jesse Bowline, and that would be another one I guess. Then we have John's comment that the group was more popular than Jesus Christ, which would be the idea that they had replaced Jesus Christ thus Antichrist. Perhaps it's not as obvious as you might like, but isn't that what you might expect from a huge deception (wouldn't be very good if it was predictable, or if it followed a prophesy)?

Fire from the sky is another difficult concept as both the Beast and False Prophet are supposed to be able to call it down. These two could easily be called Lennon & McCartney, and I would point out that this would make John Lennon the False Prophet on account of the song 'Imagine' which is a prophesy - is it not? "fresh fever from the skies" is probably how Aleister Crowley would put that, but in the Christian sense it is the expectation of a comsuming fire that takes the sacrifice from the altar - which we haven't really seen in this case. The problem here is that firstly it is a False Prophet that calls down fire from the sky, and secondly he can't really do that if he is indeed a False Prophet. So we have the problem that a False Prophet is more likely to call down 'fresh fever from the skies' than a consuming fire, given that firstly he's a Prophet and secondly we don't really offer sacrifices any more. So this could refer to inspiration or information and that may be in the form of Songs/Prayers being composed?

So to generalise, The Beatles (Le Beast) is the Beast with 7 heads. John Lennon appears to have been the False Prophet. Paul McCartney - either version appears to be the Anti-Christ. Fire from the sky which is called down by the False Prophet and the Beast, is really a reference to the songs composed by the Beatles but especially Lennon & McCartney and is really 'fever from the skies' not the fire that a true priest would expect God to respond with. There is significant evidence if one turns to the Islamic version of the Anti-Christ known as 'Masih ad-Dajjal'. This has features such as disfigured eyes, which may refer to plastic surgery. Dajjal has problems with his eyesight but fortunately Paul McCartney, who has excellent eyesight(?), has produced a helpful "Paul McCartney teaches eye yoga", video. Dajjal will have particular influence over women - much like Paul McCartney especially the earlier version. As you might imagine this could just go on and on, and it's hard to make up such stuff.

But because Sir Paul - Is the Antichrist, we have the early Paul and his songs, up to around the end of 1966 that present us with the core prayer of the Anno Domini religion (which was a slip of the tongue on the part of God, who it seems is a Beatles fan).


The Lord's Prayer:
This of course doesn't belong to God Almighty, but actually to Cambridge University Press and requires their permission to quote it - not God's. The lowly dogs of Capitalism claim higher authority than God Almighty? Presumably if God wished to give this to us in English he would need to pay the University for the right to do so? How fortunate then that it is largely redundant at this point. The Lord's Prayer has some very serious problems and is no longer appropriate for the modern era. The prayer itself exists in two different forms and given the nature of the problems involved I would seriously advise the Catholic Church to adopt the shorter version Luke 11: 2-4, as it's words are less hazardous in the modern context. In the case of Anno Domini a different prayer will be offered to account for the change to Phase 3 but here I present a rewrite of the longer form:

[spoken by the Priest]
Help me Father of Paradise,
Creator of the Universe,
Bring us your traditions,
so that we may follow them,
on our world, as it is in Paradise.
Support us and nourish us.
Accept our apologies, as we forgive the sinner.
Lead us to that which is True and Good.
For your kingdom of Paradise,
has much Knowledge and Wisdom,
And will always be greater.
We can work it out.

[spoken 'Aggressively' by the Congregation]
We can work it out.

Ⓒ Shaun Savage 2015
Permission is hereby granted that the above prayer may be used and copied for any purpose what-so-ever without the need for any citation, provided that it is not changed beyond spelling corrections or font variations, or attributed to some other author. That it may be translated into other languages but only provided that the translating authority does not then claim copyright for their version and then try to bill people for quoting it.

In the original version 'Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven' is a problem because in heaven it's done as the stars which on earth would be the Atomic Bomb, this being the manifestation of God Almighty to the people of Earth. 'Give us this day our daily bread' reads as 'Let us live' - don't kill us (the unemployed would interpret it differently I guess). The prayer fails to identify WHO God is and actually calls for ANY God who thinks that he has a great name. Not identifying the God could result in different people getting different Gods? Clearly a Satanic version could be written to summon any generic Demon who happened to be available at the time. 'Thy will be done' might then be interpreted as possession? Not just a call for the Earth to be possessed but possibly the individual as well. Possession of the earth might be viewed as an alien invasion. The original prayer was fine for the times in which it was written, and these modern ideas were not considered.

The actual meaning of the prayer is that it prays for the Atomic Age and the modern culture. The religion has generally attacked the existing culture. The Hebrews attacked the religion of the Egyptians, while the Christians attacked the religion of the Romans. Thus religion is associated with rebellion against the state or other states. The problem with this is the idea of the religion being in charge of the state, and this assumes that the human power is important, whereas God is greater and can generally do what he chooses irrespective of who claims to be in charge (which therefore doesn't matter much). So the idea of Christian Nationalism is poor, at best the idea is that an individual has the Autonomy to act in a way that he hopes is dictated by God, but only within his own personal sphere of activity. He dominates his immediate area and the people within it, in the name of his religion and God, but only to achieve his objectives. The 'Dominist' may curse the state to the extent of his alliance with God, some will have more power than others, the state may choose to listen depending on the reputation of the individual. It is that reputation that confers rank.

Clearly this is a prayer that should no longer be said, however saying so contradicts previous instructions and there are those people who will wish to persist in the old ways. For that reason I have given the version above which is an attempt to write it without the modern implications or interpretations of what it means, but God himself would have known what was being prayed for. The problem then is that the people were misled to a degree by the God himself.

The advantages of the rewritten version are: That it does not identify 'heaven' as space. That it says what God did, as a means to identify which God is being prayed to. That it does not ask an unknown power to conquer the planet! Not does it ask for the military exertion of force against us as a people. The term 'Give us' has been removed as we are not requiring a 'gift' but rather help and support targeted towards the poorer people who have a lack of food. God is not really having land to trespass upon, and confusing that with money instead is seriously bad as being in debt is not a crime. Furthermore it would be unwise to borrow money from God? Wiser though to apologise for stepping on his toes. Temptation is also problematical especially in the context of Anno Domini, likewise Evil is seen as necessary in some cases, the determination of which must rely on the 'truth' and achieving a 'good' result. God's kingdom is viewed jealously as something to aspire to but here it is twisted slightly for Phase 3 and therefore 'Power & Glory' are not the goal and so 'Knowledge & Wisdom' is targeted instead because the concern is to develop the brain (which is a change of direction). Forever and ever is here termed 'always' because our world can only be inferior. We cannot have 'A-men' as it appears to reference 'Atomic Men' and thus the Atomic Age, and because here the concern is for the brain the term 'A-men' is to be replaced with the term 'We can work it out' (and there's a good reason for that). The two weaknesses are that firstly, yes it is different, and secondly you would need to try to memorize this version instead.

The expectation is that this version may be used where a prayer that is spoken is required. It could be used for variety and it could be used in a public setting as it is not secret. It represents a correction to the dubious wording of the original so that such a prayer can still be given without accidentally praying for a Nuclear war, or Alien invasion. It takes some responsibility for the individual to work on his own problems himself and does not rely directly on delegation to an unknown/alien God.

But… this is not the prayer.

As given previously there has been a change of direction, and this was necessary. Prayers that are spoken are no longer said. Encouraging people to pray is archaic and the result is ineffective. The Rosary is still endorsed because of the Miracle of The Sun at Fatima and the association with the surviving Jesuits of the Hiroshima atomic bomb. The nature of the Rosary is thought to be a conditioning process affecting the mind or brain and this aspect is clearly within the Phase 3 direction. But prayers have been replaced with songs. The combination of music and words has produced a form that allows for the tune to remind us of the words, and the words to remind us of the tune. The result is often an automatic repetition of the song in our minds after listening to it for a few times. Although this seems to annoy some people it is ideal in the case of getting a prayer to be said regularly. The song can then be played to an audience given the required performance licence.

The reason why this article started with the Antichrist as it's main subject is because the actual song which is to be used as a prayer comes from the current Antichrist during the time when this character was representing the Good Principle, Paul McCartney the 1st prior to September 1966. The Lord's Prayer for the Anno Domini religion is the song:

We Can Work It Out, by The Beatles, written by Lennon & McCartney (the 1st)
It appears on the album called Past Masters Volume Two.

The words of this song cannot be quoted here as it would be a breach of copyright to do so. Instead I will try to give an analysis much as was done for 'Maxwell's Silver Hammer'.

In the first verse there is a clear duality and a difference of opinion. The identitities are ambiguous but in this particular context it is taken that God Almighty gives the line 'Try to see it my way'. Given the ambiguity this might be the conscious mind addressing the brain, as it is the role of the conscious mind to do all the talking, but as that talking is to the rest of the brain and given the prospect of God appearing within the structure of the brain as a distributed hive mind, it might also be considered that the practitioner may be addressing God with the same line. This possibility is emphasised by the line 'We can work it out', the association of Man with God working together using the brain as the meeting point. The emphasis on co-operation is stressed here as an aspect of the religion. Not just between Man and God but also between others (to include females).

In the second verse there is an emphasis on what is said. That what you say may in fact be wrong, and that another may say something else which may instead turn out to be correct. It then suggests a discussion to work out who is right, that together a conclusion will be reached and then followed. In the chorus it is pointed out that life is very short and should not be wasted arguing, and that this arguing should be thought of as a crime. The suggestion is then made to reconsider whether or not you, or someone else, is correct. The remaining verses repeat the general theme

It is a fairly simple song/prayer arguing that the brain and it's thinking is the important issue. That we might get the answers by thinking about the problems more carefully in association with God. This song prays for the brain to improve and become more co-operative with the conscious mind. It hedges it's bets with respect to whether it refers to the practitioner addressing God, or whether God is addressing the individual, and it implies that either could be the case. Just as the Individual is very small while the State is very big, we have an even bigger God. It is difficult for a God to interact with a Man and it would be hazardous for a Man to interact directly with a God. In the brain the consciousness is isolated as the child of the cortex, however if the rest of the cortex was a part of the hive mind of God, then consciousness would be seen as the Son of God within the context of the brain. It's clear that the brain is the safest point of contact with the God and Phase 3 emphasises the development of the brain. It's clear that Man is associated with God because God uses the spare capability of the brain in it's present state of development. It should also be clear that in sleep the consciousness of the man contracts while the use of the brain by God expands. When the man wakes his consciousness expands into areas previously used by God, and the God may leave messages behind as a form of communication.

The expectation is that the song should be obtained in it's musical form (by paying for it) and listened to on a regular basis as a way of praying that is correct for Phase 3, using a prayer structure that encourages the brain to become smarter, and to consider the words of others, and to listen for the words of God. It does not pray for nuclear war, or to be conquered by some foreign power. It does not ask for us to be indoctrinated into some other races culture. It does not ask for Alien technology! Furthermore it asks for our own wisdom to be increased, and it asks for people to try to be more reasonable, especially with each other. It also prays for an alliance with God himself. Together 'we can work it out'. We should not underestimate the value of this on the basis of it's simplicity.


Tasks
^^^^
The Antichrist is said to be a deceiver who will bring a false religion. It is said that he will deny that Jesus Christ was God. Consider whether this religion Anno Domini, is such a false religion and whether I as it's writer may be considered to be such an Antichrist or False Prophet? What evidence is there to support such a view? If this religion works well for you and you believe in it, have you then been deceived? Consider what you believe and decide what you should do about that.

Investigate the PID - Paul Is Dead conspiracy theory. Try to find evidence that it is NOT so. What really happened here. Are the Beatles slightly Satanic? Did Paul McCartney really die of a head injury in a car crash, to be replaced by a double? Why would such a suggestion even exist? Why did one Bishop describe the John Lennon song 'Imagine' as "heart-chilling"?

Obtain the Beatles tracks: We Can Work It Out, and Maxwell's Silver Hammer, and listen to them. These should be paid for as our religion and the Autonomy system believes in copyright. Can you see that these two songs are opposites? What would be the psychological impact of listening to these songs over and over again? What do these songs encourage people to do?

* It should be pointed out here that calling Sir Paul McCartney the Antichrist might be considered libel in a legal sense. However those that believe this should be purchasing at least two Beatles albums (albeit second hand) in order to consider this in more detail and as a consequence the financial compensation for labelling him in this way is automatically generated by the people believing this - thus automatic compensation is generated on a person by person basis. So if I am guilty of something Evil, I have ensured that something Good happens in return to balance out the situation (in accordance with the requirements of our religion).

I want you to think very carefully about the words of the song 'We Can Work It Out'. Pay particular attention to the line 'We can work it out and get it straight, or say good night'. Here we have two options, either A) Saying "Good Night", or B) Getting it straight, and then NOT saying "Good Night". What is he getting straight? Originally the song is about the relationship between Paul and Jane Asher, so the implication is sexual. There are clearly euphemisms implied here. Given that this is a song to be listened to regularly as a prayer is it possible that some form of subliminal influence may be transmitted mentally (or perhaps sonically) to influence another person into a position of agreement? Investigate whether this is so. The song may appear simple but has hidden depths, and as a prayer it may also be expected to generate some directly beneficial effect for the individual listening to it on a regular basis.


Important Points
^^^^^^^^^^^
- The Antichrist is an important religious icon to be respected, but may appear in Good or Evil form.

- The Antichrist may be viewed as a failed Messiah who offers a choice between Good and Evil.

- The alternation of Good and Evil is similar to walking which is a defining feature of the human race.

- St. Paul was an Antichrist who was initially Evil, but who became Good after his encounter with Jesus Christ.

- Sir Paul McCartney formerly of the Beatles is pointed out as a modern Antichrist who became Evil.

- The Beatles are considered to be the Beast, while John Lennon is thought to be the False Prophet.

- Maxwell's Silver Hammer is a Satanic prayer that has resulted in school children attacking their teachers.

- The original Lord's Prayer when viewed in a modern context prays for things that might be bad.

- A corrected version of the Lord's Prayer was given to maintain a link with past practices.

- The new Lord's Prayer for the modern world is the song 'We Can Work It Out' by Paul McCartney (1st).

- Prayers are now expected to be in the form of popular songs and therefore some caution is required.

- The new prayer/song 'We Can Work It Out' can be expected to exert an influence.