Posted by ShaunS on
URL: https://coalpha.arkian.net/EQUALITY-vs-INEQUALITY-tp7576256p7576474.html

On the one hand you only believe in absolute facts, but... on the other hand only the absolute facts of the afterlife count? The afterlife is not a fact as it hasn't really been proven? On top of that you have to live and then die to get to the afterlife, but if the human race ceased to exist then it wouldn't live thus wouldn't die and thus wouldn't reach the afterlife. Unless there is also a before life?

Evolution gets what evolution wants through testing the individual during that individuals life. Often it seems to favour low intelligence average individuals.

The key problem with this planet is that the cost of living is quite high and many species are competing for survival. As the dominant species we compete against one another. Governments in their greed like to try to make the cost of living even higher and have the population working as slaves. Their money is a requirement and therefore work is a requirement. Even gypsies are given money so that they can be controlled within this structure.

The world is very unjust and often very unfair.

God is an interesting subject. The blasphemy is that God is probably the Son not the Father, and the Father is most likely to be the Father of God (his son). The human brain must first become God like, and then in combination with other similarly charged brains form a hive mind of an even more powerful externalised God. So man creates God through religious practice, but the man himself must improve himself before a God can appear as a byproduct of the man.

So the world is very chaotic and is not how it is supposed to be. I myself, think that if we are required to work for a living, that this is a sign of a failed culture. In the modern world we work about five times more that we would have done in a more primitive world and over population makes the situation worse.

The problem with evolution is that it's best fit. A problem requires a specific solution and the creature that provides it gets to live, but on a different occasion a different problem will require some other answer and the group that survived last time gets wiped out this time. The survivor has to combine both strategies and the result is increased complexity - thus evolution. But it is BEST FIT, not the strongest nor the smartest, and on top of that it's dependent on the circumstances which is a factor based on the calendar - the actual timing.

Inferiority and superiority have to be measured through comparison - thus relative not absolute. As this is relative and in general practice what ever is superior, will always be replaced by something that is later discovered to be even better. There will always be someone greater and smarter than yourself. In a technical profession this is discovered very quickly. In practice you can never be the best for very long.

But... what practical strategies do you suggest? Have you found any practical solutions that can allow a person to become even more superior? Or what would the nature of such strategies be. Would they be physical or mental strategies? Would they be scientific or religious strategies? Would they be social strategies?

The hive mind concept is a very generous concept. The people who can power a God must also develop a control structure, a centre of intelligence. The most powerful brain might corral the hive as it were. The people would submit to the will of the God - but they would not submit because they would not be aware of it - it would be automatic co-ordination of their activities much like bees. The egotistical is automatically accounted for and measured within the power structure. Who ever is the strongest would tend to lead automatically. In this sense evolution may have an impact on who has the most powerful brain, so it is not irrelevant as you suggest.

Although other people may be worthless, again in the sense of a hive mind God form, they are still useful as they can contribute their mental capacity - and if they have less then their brains will have more surplus capacity and this means that in religious terms thick people are actually more useful than smart people and again you need both. They are also good at following religious practices and those practices could empower a God even if that God is external to themselves. So people are not worthless even though they may seem worthless to you. They have a use but you are not using them - your failure not theirs.

The inferior are to be used by the superior, so again they exist for a reason and they are not to be despised. I think given your belief in absolute facts that you should focus more on practical realisation. Useful practical techniques to enhance the human condition. Again test any practices on these worthless people.