Re: EQUALITY vs INEQUALITY
Posted by purpleduck on
URL: https://coalpha.arkian.net/EQUALITY-vs-INEQUALITY-tp7576256p7576436.html
"Females who believe in equality in absolute terms could easily end up looking inferior by focussing on tasks that they are not good at, and the male environment in which this would occur could easily cause broad generalisations of the ineptitude of all females not just those creating the impression. "
But see, most females do not seem to have QUALITY STANDARDS on everything, and thus don't care or don't get the idea of "looking inferior", as they won't to themselves (in my understanding). They value success over value and objective quality of the service provided. Also their definition of success is quite mediocre, ie having a family and a salary to them is "success". They usually don't think very "big". They're very mediocre beings, with mediocre expectations and ideas of happiness and wellbeing IN THEIR BEST FORM.
In short we must remember that average females and many males lack STANDARDS, and as a consequence don't believe in inferiority or superiority if not on an "emotional" level. They don't take actual, logical superiority seriously and that is the basic on why the are completely unsuccessful at being QUALITY PEOPLE. Only a person with STANDARDS, whether he is aware of them or claims them or not, can hope of achieving quality and superiority.
Females are children who laugh at the very serious nature of superiority.
They are just underdeveloped. They are to be compared to male CHILDREN, not male adults. Most females don't really grow up as HUMANS. As an overall HUMAN value - intelligence, reason, morals - I don't think it can be denied that females ARE inferior. I have always taken it for granted. Everytime a feminist woman screams "i'm equal" or "i'm superior", it is a given to me and I'm sure most people take for granted that they obviously aren't, but come on, let the children play. I GAVE ALWAYS THOUGHT MOST PEOPLE DON'T FIGHT AGAINST THEM JUST AS YOU DON'T FIGHT FOR CHILDREN. Men don't really think they're equal or inferior...they act like they do because the children have to play.
But these are morons, who don't see that what started as a game has become a serious social issue. The lie of female "equality" or even superiority.
Also, let us never forget that men of the same gender aren't equal, there too some are superior and others inferior.
These are facts and anyone who denies these surely is a dullard. And there again...is he a dullard or is he only unwilling to oppose the children who aren't expected to be serious all the time?
A serious man takes serious matters seriously. Superiority is a serious matter.
Also in sexual attraction. Do we men find GORGEOUS, BEAUTIFUL women "cute" or "funny" ever? Women don't take ANYTHING seriously, including beauty. They most often call a gorgeous, classic good looking man "cute" and that's a perfect example. We wouldn't call model Alessandra Ambrosio "cute" or "nice", we have RELIGIOUS RESPECT and take her beauty with extreme seriousness.
Women don't take anything with the required seriousness. Schopenhauer stressed as women are the "unaesthetic sex" for their incapacity of feeling the greatness of great art and music, something that I have always noticed.
In conclusion: women are CHILDREN, and are not expected to hold serious matter with the right seriousness. They take irrelevant ones seriously instead, like their hair and clothing. For male standards, women ARE stupid and men must consider them so, and the former would be twice the stupid to expect men to take them seriously and think of them as SERIOUS people who deserve respect.
We must respect the gorgeousness of Alessandra Ambrosio (or any other you consider gorgeous, it's just an example) and take it with extreme seriousness, as doing so, and not playing around, will make us come hard and make children. This is how nature has ordained. Notice also how much more seriously men take SEX in comparison to women? I have seen way too many women lacking seriousness in bed...almost phone-calling while being penetrated...they don't even enjoy sex right. They dont' take it seriously...I find it extremely, sexually annoying. I have met no woman that satisfies me sexually or in any other way. They're just too stupid for my taste. They simply lack intelligence and seriousness and overall they are to be laughed at as humans - only their body is an extremely serious matter. Objectifying things RIGHT, is a sign of objectivism and rationality; standards. Women have none.
Nothing is more seriously disturbing, yet also tragicomically hilarious than a feminist woman who wants to be respected for her completely stupid assessments and ideology. That is, your average western female "student"...university makes them think they're intellectual and intelligent. No they're not...their brain is that of a chicken, to a man of intelligence.