Re: Noob to Join, IF . . .

Posted by Ungrateful One on
URL: https://coalpha.arkian.net/Noob-to-Join-IF-tp7574821p7574826.html

Thoughts on Sexual Utopia in Power
Let me start by saying that, purely from a natural standpoint, men are polygamous while women are (supposed to be) monogamous. It implies this in the opening paragraph. It says women don't ovulate nearly as much as men . . . generate sperm over the course of a lifetime. Men can father more children than any one woman can give birth to. I'm not saying men can't be monogamous, and we clearly see women who are no such thing, so all you religious nut jobs shouldn't sharpen your crosses and de-rust your chains. I'm coming from a scientific, biological direction.

Let's get something straight though: there is no sexual utopia. Maybe places comparable to one, but no such place truly exists. And women are "gold-diggers" in every country. Yes, all women are like that. 99.9% are like that, while of the remaining .1 (not even a full 1) % are dead, married, uninterested in marrying again after being widowed, or apart of some undiscovered tribe. Basically, all off-limits.

The book also talks about how women learned to act how they wanted with little or no responsibility. Their happiness should be found without any risk. This is a lie that feminism sold to them, but let's be clear on something: they need to be held accountable for their actions. As said before, I'm not here to dick around with you, and if you're going to give ANYONE -- man or woman -- a free pass rather than call them on their bullshit, you will be shat on. Some were lied to, some knew exactly what kind of game they were playing. Men and women have had a hand in creating this shitstorm, and that is fact.

If anything, this book's title, while a bit delusional, is hopeful and has an underlying message: Do something! The Brotherhood needs to take action to bring about its wishes. Men have it hard, but women shouldn't mess with clowns and losers, either. I think maybe some other reading material should be mandatory for something like this. Yes, sex is great, but believe it or not, women are good for other things. If I were one, I wouldn't want a man -- local or foreign -- all up in my kool-aid when he doesn't have his shit together. I'm not saying mind-bogglingly rich, but a job at all isn't asking much. A mansion? Not necessary. But SOME place to call home, or his spot? That isn't the moon, now.

The book was a good read, but not a great read. This Brotherhood should be about so much more. More than just sex, and women behaving themselves. Men have to own up and grow too. They have to have goals too and do things too. Even though I have no intention of pandering to American women to get laid, I have passively tried to come about sex. Why? Because I believe in taking some kind of control to bring about my desires. I'm not buying a new car or attending PUA classes. If my basic personality doesn't stimulate a woman, she can walk. But if something can happen, why not?

I don't believe in whining, and my willingness to work with the Brotherhood to develop effective solutions is why I should be allowed to join. If you're not convinced, oh well, I'll still do what I need to do. But together, we can do great things.

It's in your hands now, site.