Posted by Shau on
URL: https://coalpha.arkian.net/Fun-times-with-Mr-FS-tp7574642p7574644.html

"The fact is that Liberalism supports adultery and does everything in its power to promote adultery." Clear example of liberalism promoting adultery?

"Two of the issues mentioned in this video are drug laws and anti-prostitution laws.  These are usually not seen as Liberal laws, but in fact they are.  When America was primarily a Christian nation, neither of these were illegal.  They became illegal when America became more Liberal."

Very strange. It's the religious people in New Zealand that tend to hate drugs and prostitution, and the leftists that are trying to keep them legal or have them legalized (Prostitution is legal, typical drugs such as marijuana are not).

"Liberals hate monogamy and support promiscuity which is the most unequal mating system."

Examples of this, please. I've never met a leftist in New Zealand that hated monogamy or ever promoted promiscuity. Most of them would probably believe in a person's right to be promiscuous if they wanted to be, however.

"With promiscuity, some men get many women and many men get no women."

This seems to be the case where monogamy is the norm as well. The bottom-of-the-barrel men, instead of not being selected as a fuck buddy, do not get selected as a husband. They're screwed (no pun intended) either way.

"Liberals support this system because it is immoral and selfish."

...and where are all these liberals? Maybe it's been far too long since I lived in America, but I don't seem to recall the people voting democrat going around pushing for laws just because they're immoral or selfish. This statement sounds bogus.

"Liberal men are concerned that women and children are cared for because they are promiscuous and so have no idea who their children are..."

I'm just curious. How many countries besides the United States have you lived in? What parts of the US have you lived in? Do you live in San Francisco or something...? The leftists here in NZ are no more promiscuous than those on the right, and I do not recall the US being like this when I lived there either.

"Liberals only care that children are provided for, they don't really care what is in the child's best interest because that would be having both parents there to raise the child."

Citation please. I'd like to see scientific studies demonstrating that it takes two parents in order to properly raise a child.

"Liberal men care about economic equality because they do not want to compete for women on the basis of how good a provider they are..."

It has been my experience that most people with leftist economic beliefs believe only in an even playing field, not total and absolute equality.

"Liberalism rejected tradition from the beginning because Liberalism didn't understand the reasoning behind tradition."

This is absolute nonsense. You have some kind of deluded idea of what leftists act like. I know for a fact that liberals don't go around hating traditions. If anything, they'll hate traditions that are believed to be harmful, but that's pretty much everyone.

"For a new tradition to fully express its effect on a culture probably takes around three generations."

And this is based on what kind of evidence?

"But which of the beliefs of Liberals are actually based on proof?  None."

This is more absolute nonsense. You sound like a raving nutjob with this kind of talk. You really expect me to buy that every single liberal ideal in the US isn't based on any kind of proof or reasoning? I've got a good website for you, friend. Check this out, I get the feeling you'd fit right in: www.conservapedia.com

"But if you consider the time when Genesis was written and compare it to other creation myths of other religions, you will find that Genesis is far closer to what modern science says."

This is absolute rubbish. The creation account in the Bible does not remotely resemble what happened in reality.

"In fact I would say that Genesis is about as close to the truth as the people of that time were capable of understanding."

I guess. That doesn't change the fact that it was completely and utterly wrong.

"If one doesn't take Genesis completely literally, it does match modern science very closely."

No it does not. There is a reason why we had no idea how it all went down before science figured it all out: Because the Bible doesn't give us even the slightest glimpse as to how it all went down.

"At some point these bigger brighter feathers were no longer an indication of good health.  So why didn't the females stop preferring such males?"

Absolutely wrong. Have you ever picked up a university-level book on evolution? Having those large feathers is considered selectively advantageous, because it indicates to the females: 1 that he can AFFORD to grow such feathers, and 2, that he can SURVIVE even with such big and bright feathers. It's a clear indication of his quality genes.

I'm seriously beginning to question the purpose in this. You make about as much sense as an evangelical creationist. If you honestly believe that the Bible comes anywhere close to describing how the Earth and cosmos were created, then there is nothing I will be able to do to even make a dent in your beliefs.